読者です 読者をやめる 読者になる 読者になる

だ・か・らっ、Dia“l”yだってばさ!

これは『戯れ言』です。また、“Diary”ではなく“Dialy”です。つまり、日記に似て非なるものです。 所謂『日記』ではありません。お間違えの無いようお願いします。(^^;A

なんだろう、これは???

dnetc CUDA

9800GTX+でのbenchmarkです。

$ ./dnetc -bench rc5-72

distributed.net client for CUDA 2.2 on Linux Copyright 1997-2009, distributed.net
Please visit http://www.distributed.net/ for up-to-date contest information.
Start the client with '-help' for a list of valid command line options.


dnetc v2.9105-511-CTL-09070517-*dev* for CUDA 2.2 on Linux (Linux 2.6.24-24-generic).
Please provide the *entire* version descriptor when submitting bug reports.
The distributed.net bug report pages are at http://bugs.distributed.net/
Using email address (distributed.net ID) 'sr@hyper.cx'

[Jul 08 02:33:25 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd).
[Jul 08 02:33:44 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd)
                      0.00:00:16.64 [72,020,956 keys/sec]
[Jul 08 02:33:44 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd).
[Jul 08 02:34:03 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (CUDA 1-pipe 128-thd)
                      0.00:00:16.78 [108,269,460 keys/sec]
[Jul 08 02:34:03 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd).
[Jul 08 02:34:23 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (CUDA 1-pipe 256-thd)
                      0.00:00:16.59 [141,208,103 keys/sec]
[Jul 08 02:34:23 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd).
[Jul 08 02:34:41 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (CUDA 2-pipe 64-thd)
                      0.00:00:16.44 [105,540,447 keys/sec]
[Jul 08 02:34:41 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd).
[Jul 08 02:35:00 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (CUDA 2-pipe 128-thd)
                      0.00:00:16.08 [123,804,277 keys/sec]
[Jul 08 02:35:00 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd).
[Jul 08 02:35:18 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (CUDA 4-pipe 64-thd)
                      0.00:00:16.31 [145,057,495 keys/sec]
[Jul 08 02:35:18 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd).
[Jul 08 02:35:38 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (CUDA 4-pipe 128-thd)
                      0.00:00:16.48 [147,036,583 keys/sec]
[Jul 08 02:35:38 UTC] RC5-72: using core #9 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait).
[Jul 08 02:35:57 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #9 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait)
                      0.00:00:17.00 [184,752,084 keys/sec]
[Jul 08 02:35:57 UTC] RC5-72: using core #10 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us).
[Jul 08 02:36:16 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #10 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep 100us)
                      0.00:00:17.05 [70,792,776 keys/sec]
[Jul 08 02:36:16 UTC] RC5-72: using core #11 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic).
[Jul 08 02:36:35 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #11 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd sleep dynamic)
                      0.00:00:16.56 [70,198,765 keys/sec]
[Jul 08 02:36:35 UTC] RC5-72 benchmark summary :
                      Default core : #0 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd)
                      Fastest core : #9 (CUDA 1-pipe 64-thd busy wait)
[Jul 08 02:36:35 UTC] Core #9 is significantly faster than the default core.
                      The CUDA core selection has been made as a tradeoff between cor ...
                      and responsiveness of the graphical desktop.
                      Please file a bug report along with the output of -cpuinfo
                      only if the the faster core selection does not degrade graphics ...


このclient、やたら遅くないですか? (T-T)